coalitiongirl (
coalitiongirl) wrote in
sq_roundrobin2015-04-26 11:33 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Entry tags:
Plot, Plot, Plot
So we now have our writers and you've looked through all the technical details, and now it's time to talk plot! We've got seven days to suggest and discuss any ideas you have in the comments, and here are two things to keep in mind:
Oh, and I don't think we'll do a totally alternate universe this time around because many people aren't used to writing out of the 'verse. Anything that takes place within the OUAT universe, even if it's a complete deviation from canon, is fair game.
- Each chapter should ideally be a story in itself. We're each getting one opportunity to write and so we want a plot that allows for each writer to play within the 'verse without being caught up in transitional chapters or the like!
- At the same time, we also want to have one coherent ongoing plot that allows for development so it doesn't read like a series of short stories.
- We could rewrite a season. We have exactly as many writers as there are episodes, and we could each tackle one. (I'm wary of this option simply because there's the OUATVS and because I don't know about the rest of you, but I find episode rewrites kind of dull, especially when we have many stronger writers than the OUAT ones?)
- We can settle on a theme with stronger individual chapter plots and a weaker overall plot. I suggested tropes before- it could be something like "some kind of magical trickster has come to town and keeps casting wacky spells," and then we go from there. (I've seen people do that way back when SQW did magical mishaps.) In that, the story would be very much about individual chapters and character/relationship development, but it's tricky because the latter sometimes gets lost in the process.
- We can settle on one standard plot that we like and write to it- this is generally easy and straightforward, though you do need a more intricately organized outline from the start so you don't run out of plot along the way.
Oh, and I don't think we'll do a totally alternate universe this time around because many people aren't used to writing out of the 'verse. Anything that takes place within the OUAT universe, even if it's a complete deviation from canon, is fair game.
no subject
I wasn't aware that there's a difference between saying Ms and Miss, would it be ok for one of you to expand a little on this?
I usually use Miss, but only because I've always thought Ms to simply be an abbreviation.
C.
no subject
"Ms." arose as a basic "fuck you" to the Miss/Mrs. dichotomy, as a way to address women without referring to their marital status. It can be used for all women.
Along with my own feminist leanings towards Ms., I think that Regina as a character would be a Ms. user for a couple of reasons:
1. The first time she uses it on Emma, she has no idea whether or not Emma is married, so the neutral word makes more sense. (Sure, Emma's not wearing a ring, but not everyone does, so this is not a definitive sign of Not Married.)
2. (More important than #1, IMO.) Given the history of her own marriage, I have a really hard time seeing Regina use titles that are based on whether or not a woman is married. It just...really doesn't seem like Regina, to me. I think she would find it offensive. (The one exception I can see to this is Snow--during the curse, I can see Regina calling her "Miss Blanchard" rather than "Ms. Blanchard," because separating Snow from David was one of Regina's successes, so I think using "Miss" for Snow could serve as one of Regina's inside jokes.)
Anyways. Those are my thoughts on the matter. Others feel free to chime in!
no subject
I really thought it was the same thing.
Thanks, and I vote for Ms. Swan then.
C.
no subject
no subject
no subject
- Miss is a perfectly standard and accepted way to address women whose marital status is unknown.
- You can be a feminist and still use Miss. I do, and I’ll be damned if any of you are going to tell me that I’m not a feminist when I was voting while most of you were in nappies/diapers and eating mushed bananas.
- Pretty sure we’ve seen scripts with 'Miss Swan’, so if we’re going International English Rumplestiltskin (because that’s canon), then this is no different.
- The headcanon is good (and I agree that Regina prob would have put a little extra spin on the ‘Miss’ in front of Blanchard because sassy) but there’s no way in this lifetime you will convince me that LanaP is not saying ‘Miss’ every time her character refers to Emma Swan.
But, YMMV. Obvs, it already does.
ETA: insisting that Ms is used for all women removes the agency of those who made a very conscious, feminist decision NOT to marry, and who want that decision to be recognised and acknowledged.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject