coalitiongirl: (Default)
coalitiongirl ([personal profile] coalitiongirl) wrote in [community profile] sq_roundrobin2015-04-26 11:33 am

Plot, Plot, Plot

 So we now have our writers and you've looked through all the technical details, and now it's time to talk plot! We've got seven days to suggest and discuss any ideas you have in the comments, and here are two things to keep in mind:
  • Each chapter should ideally be a story in itself. We're each getting one opportunity to write and so we want a plot that allows for each writer to play within the 'verse without being caught up in transitional chapters or the like!
  • At the same time, we also want to have one coherent ongoing plot that allows for development so it doesn't read like a series of short stories.
So this can work in several ways.
  • We could rewrite a season. We have exactly as many writers as there are episodes, and we could each tackle one. (I'm wary of this option simply because there's the OUATVS and because I don't know about the rest of you, but I find episode rewrites kind of dull, especially when we have many stronger writers than the OUAT ones?)
  • We can settle on a theme with stronger individual chapter plots and a weaker overall plot. I suggested tropes before- it could be something like "some kind of magical trickster has come to town and keeps casting wacky spells," and then we go from there. (I've seen people do that way back when SQW did magical mishaps.) In that, the story would be very much about individual chapters and character/relationship development, but it's tricky because the latter sometimes gets lost in the process.
  • We can settle on one standard plot that we like and write to it- this is generally easy and straightforward, though you do need a more intricately organized outline from the start so you don't run out of plot along the way. 
Please drop your suggestions in the comments and discuss them! Reply to each other and talk about what you want to write and what you think might work for a story like this. This post closes on May 2, and we'll poll for your favorite option of the ones suggested from May 3-5.

Oh, and I don't think we'll do a totally alternate universe this time around because many people aren't used to writing out of the 'verse. Anything that takes place within the OUAT universe, even if it's a complete deviation from canon, is fair game.

[personal profile] madasaboxofcats 2015-04-26 06:23 pm (UTC)(link)
I think that could be interesting. I imagine there could be some interesting Charming-family stuff in there, too -- Emma knowing that the family she always sought was within reach, but also knowing that they gave her up, and knowing that if she was going to have her Family, she'd have to give up Mary Margaret, probably the only real friend she'd had in a very long time, if not since Lily.
bladeddarkness: (Default)

[personal profile] bladeddarkness 2015-04-26 11:58 pm (UTC)(link)
I'll take any excuse to rewatch S1 (and S2). I also agree with allaine, Mary Margaret and Belle (and Ruby & Kathryn) are going to be interesting. If Rumpel brings magic back, he'll probably try to bring Belle's memories back.

... we should probably get a consistent spelling for Gold too, unless we just call him 'Gold'. Rumpel or Rumple?

[personal profile] snarkingturtle 2015-04-27 09:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Along with Rumpel/Rumple, if we're doing an early story, we also need consistency on Ms. Swan vs Miss Swan (personal preference goes to Ms., but I know others might feel differently).
bladeddarkness: (Default)

[personal profile] bladeddarkness 2015-04-27 10:07 pm (UTC)(link)
And Henry's age, since we're covering a long period of time.
amycarey: (Default)

[personal profile] amycarey 2015-04-28 05:31 am (UTC)(link)
MS MS MS (but I am maybe a strident feminist re: titles so... This is the hill I live and die on far too often, like, it is ridiculous.)

[personal profile] snarkingturtle 2015-04-28 05:34 am (UTC)(link)
IT IS A WORTHY HILL I support this cause.
paradoxalpoised: (Default)

[personal profile] paradoxalpoised 2015-04-28 12:11 pm (UTC)(link)
The full name is Rumpelstiltskin so Rumpel seems appropiate this way.

I wasn't aware that there's a difference between saying Ms and Miss, would it be ok for one of you to expand a little on this?

I usually use Miss, but only because I've always thought Ms to simply be an abbreviation.

C.

[personal profile] snarkingturtle 2015-04-28 03:10 pm (UTC)(link)
"Miss" is for unmarried woman (opposite of "Mrs.").

"Ms." arose as a basic "fuck you" to the Miss/Mrs. dichotomy, as a way to address women without referring to their marital status. It can be used for all women.

Along with my own feminist leanings towards Ms., I think that Regina as a character would be a Ms. user for a couple of reasons:

1. The first time she uses it on Emma, she has no idea whether or not Emma is married, so the neutral word makes more sense. (Sure, Emma's not wearing a ring, but not everyone does, so this is not a definitive sign of Not Married.)

2. (More important than #1, IMO.) Given the history of her own marriage, I have a really hard time seeing Regina use titles that are based on whether or not a woman is married. It just...really doesn't seem like Regina, to me. I think she would find it offensive. (The one exception I can see to this is Snow--during the curse, I can see Regina calling her "Miss Blanchard" rather than "Ms. Blanchard," because separating Snow from David was one of Regina's successes, so I think using "Miss" for Snow could serve as one of Regina's inside jokes.)

Anyways. Those are my thoughts on the matter. Others feel free to chime in!
paradoxalpoised: (Default)

[personal profile] paradoxalpoised 2015-04-28 06:57 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, that changes things. I had no idea. And I like your thoughts. I might start making sure I write down Ms. Swan and not Miss Swan, being a feminist myself, it definitely seems more appealing now that I have the knowledge to make the difference.

I really thought it was the same thing.

Thanks, and I vote for Ms. Swan then.

C.
bladeddarkness: (Default)

[personal profile] bladeddarkness 2015-04-28 07:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Interesting. The whole Miss/Mrs./Ms. thing was something I learned in first grade but not the whys. Is there a pronunciation difference? I always say Ms. as "Miz" in my head, but then again, my English teacher told me it was "sub-tell".

[personal profile] snarkingturtle 2015-04-28 07:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Ms. is indeed "Miz" (and Miss is like it looks). How subtle it is depends a little bit on what comes after it--said in front of "Swan," they basically sound alike, because it elides either way. It's easier to hear in front of names that don't start with S (or with a soft C, I suppose).
devje: (Default)

[personal profile] devje 2015-05-01 07:38 am (UTC)(link)
Eh, I respectfully disagree for a number of reasons:

- Miss is a perfectly standard and accepted way to address women whose marital status is unknown.
- You can be a feminist and still use Miss. I do, and I’ll be damned if any of you are going to tell me that I’m not a feminist when I was voting while most of you were in nappies/diapers and eating mushed bananas.
- Pretty sure we’ve seen scripts with 'Miss Swan’, so if we’re going International English Rumplestiltskin (because that’s canon), then this is no different.
- The headcanon is good (and I agree that Regina prob would have put a little extra spin on the ‘Miss’ in front of Blanchard because sassy) but there’s no way in this lifetime you will convince me that LanaP is not saying ‘Miss’ every time her character refers to Emma Swan.

But, YMMV. Obvs, it already does.

ETA: insisting that Ms is used for all women removes the agency of those who made a very conscious, feminist decision NOT to marry, and who want that decision to be recognised and acknowledged.
Edited 2015-05-01 08:09 (UTC)
ariestess: (Default)

[personal profile] ariestess 2015-05-02 12:30 am (UTC)(link)
I've always felt this way about the whole Ms. vs Miss debate and how Regina uses them. Though I admit that I may have written Ms. Blanchard a time or two, especially in the beginning. But I've always been a Ms. Swan person.

[personal profile] snarkingturtle 2015-04-29 01:27 am (UTC)(link)
I think that it's Rumpelstiltskin in most fairytale anthologies, but Rumplestiltskin on the dagger in the show? Which is where some of the confusion comes in in terms of picking a spelling.
paradoxalpoised: (Default)

[personal profile] paradoxalpoised 2015-04-29 04:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Ok That too is interesting. I actually haven't checked the dagger and always used the actual anthologies name. I'm fine with whatever is canon, I suppose, is it consistent?
damelola: (Default)

[personal profile] damelola 2015-04-30 09:12 pm (UTC)(link)
The production guys actually misspelled it on the dagger so it takes the Brit/Canadian rule of Rumplestiltskin. I think someone pulled Adam up on it and he said it was canon! Make of that what you all will! LOL